---
title: "Social Media Character Limits by Platform (2026)"
description: "Character limits for X, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Threads, YouTube, and Pinterest—plus a live counter that weights URLs the way X does."
canonical_url: https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits
html_url: https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits
content_type: text/markdown
generated_from: social-media-character-limits.html
---

> Character limits for X, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Threads, YouTube, and Pinterest—plus a live counter that weights URLs the way X does.

Social media character limits

# Every platform limit, and the line where readers stop seeing you.

Two numbers matter for every post you write. The hard limit is where the platform rejects you. The fold is where the feed cuts you off. Most character counters only know the first one, and they measure it wrong.

[Count a post now](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#counter)
[Jump to the table](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#table)

Limits verified **28 July 2026** · re-checked each release

The distinction that matters
**The hard limit** is a rejection threshold. **The fold** is an attention threshold. You write for the second and validate against the first.

**Claim before the fold** +
**Proof inside the limit** =
**A post that survives both**

On this page
[Limits by platform](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#table)
[Live counter](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#counter)
[The fold](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#fold)
[Why counts disagree](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#counting)
[Enforcement](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#enforce)
[FAQ](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#faq)

01 · The reference

## Character limits by platform.

The hard limit column is what the platform accepts. The visible column is roughly how much appears in a feed before a reader has to tap or click to see the rest. Truncation points are approximate by nature — they move with device width, line breaks, and attached media — so they are given as the ranges publishers actually observe rather than as false precision.

Hard limits and feed truncation points, verified 28 July 2026. Platforms change these without notice; the counter below applies the same numbers.

| Platform
| Field
| Hard limit
| Visible before the fold

| X (free)
| Post
| 280 Links always cost 23, regardless of real length.
| ~280 Short enough that the whole post shows.

| X (Premium)
| Post
| 25,000 Basic, Premium, and Premium+ tiers.
| ~280 Past 280 the post collapses behind Show more.

| LinkedIn
| Post
| 3,000
| 140–210 Nearer 140 on mobile, 210 on desktop.

| Instagram
| Caption
| 2,200 Maximum 30 hashtags per post.
| ~125 Then a "more" link.

| Instagram
| Bio
| 150
| 150 Fully visible on the profile.

| TikTok
| Caption
| 4,000 Raised from 2,200; older guides are stale.
| ~100 One or two lines over the video.

| Facebook
| Post
| 63,206
| ~250 Then See more.

| Threads
| Post
| 500 Plus a longer text attachment.
| ~250

| YouTube
| Title
| 100
| ~60 Search and suggested feeds clip earlier.

| YouTube
| Description
| 5,000
| ~150 Above the Show more control.

| Pinterest
| Pin description
| 500
| ~50 Close-up view shows more.

| Email
| Subject line
| no hard cap Clients accept far more than they show.
| ~50 Mobile inboxes clip earliest.

A limit tells you when you will be rejected. A fold tells you when you will be ignored. Only one of them is a writing constraint.

02 · Live counter

## Count it the way the platform counts it.

Paste a post below. The counter reports plain length, then shows how each platform would score the same text — including X's rule that every link costs a flat 23 characters and that many non-Latin code points weigh two. Nothing you type leaves your browser.

Your post

_[Text area: Paste or type your post here…]_

Characters **0**

As X counts **0**

Words **0**

Links **0**

### Where this text fits

Runs entirely in your browser. No text is uploaded, logged, or stored.

03 · The fold

## Almost nobody taps "see more".

The truncation point is the real constraint on a social post, because the text after it is opt-in. Everything that has to land — the claim, the tension, the reason to keep reading — has to happen before the cut.

- 1 **Lead with the claim** Put the specific, falsifiable statement first. Not context, not a greeting, not a throat-clearing preamble.

- 2 **Spend the fold on tension** The visible lines should create a reason to expand. A summary removes that reason.

- 3 **Keep proof below** Numbers, caveats, and sourcing belong after the cut, where the reader has already chosen to continue.

04 · Counting rules

## Why your counter and the platform disagree.

Three rules break naive counting. Each one produces the same failure: a post that looks like it fits, then gets rejected or silently mangled at publish time.

**Rule one**

### Links are a fixed cost

X wraps every link in t.co , so any http or https URL counts as exactly 23 characters — a five-character link and a two-hundred-character tracked link cost the same. Shortening a URL to save room on X does nothing.

**Rule two**

### Not every character weighs one

Under X's published weighting, Latin text and common punctuation weigh one unit; most other code points, including CJK characters, weigh two. A post that is 280 characters long can be 400 units heavy.

**Rule three**

### Emoji are worse than they look

A plain emoji usually costs two units. Add a skin-tone or flag modifier, or a zero-width-joiner sequence like a family emoji, and one visible glyph can cost several units.

**Rule four**

### Placeholders expand later

Copy written with a token that becomes a link at publish time has to be counted as the expanded link. Validate at the pre-expansion length and an approved post can turn undeliverable the moment it ships.

05 · Enforcement

## A limit you do not check is a limit you will break.

These numbers are not trivia in MarketMaster — they are deterministic gates. Generated campaign copy is measured before any human is asked to approve it, using the same weighting shown above, so an over-length asset fails as a mechanical error instead of arriving as a publishing surprise.

X posts **280 weighted units** Counted with the t.co link rule, so validation and publish agree.

LinkedIn **3,000 characters** Checked per asset before review.

Email subject **50 characters** Held to the visible line, not the client's tolerance.

Carousel headline **12 words** Measured in words, because a slide fails on line count.

### Before you schedule a post

- **Weighted, not raw:** Did you count links at 23 and non-Latin characters at two?

- **Expanded, not tokenised:** Did you count the final URL rather than the placeholder standing in for it?

- **Fold first:** Does the claim land inside the visible window on mobile, not just on desktop?

- **Per-platform, not shared:** Did the same copy get re-checked against each destination's own limit?

- **Fresh numbers:** Are you working from current limits rather than a guide written before TikTok's caption expansion?

06 · Common questions
## Character limit FAQ

### What is the character limit for a post on X?
A free X account can post 280 characters. X Basic, Premium, and Premium+ subscribers can post up to 25,000. X does not count naively: every link counts as a flat 23 characters, and many non-Latin code points count as two.

### What is the LinkedIn post character limit?
3,000 characters. The number that changes results is the fold — roughly 140 characters on mobile and 210 on desktop before the see-more link, shifting with line breaks and attached media.

### How long can an Instagram caption be?
2,200 characters with a maximum of 30 hashtags, but only about the first 125 characters show before the caption is truncated. The bio is a separate 150-character field.

### Why does my character count differ from the platform's?
Most counters measure string length; platforms do not. Links, non-Latin characters, and emoji all carry weights above one. Counting by string length will tell you a post fits when the platform will reject it. The [counter above](https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits#counter) applies the real weighting.

### Should I write to the maximum character limit?
No. The hard limit is where you get rejected, not a target. Write for the truncation point, because that is all most readers see, and treat the remaining allowance as room for proof rather than filler.

### How current are these numbers?
They were verified on 28 July 2026 and are re-checked as part of our release process. Platforms change limits without announcement — if you find one of these out of date, we would rather hear about it than keep publishing it.

Limits, checked automatically

## Stop counting posts by hand.

MarketMaster writes channel-native copy from one source and validates every asset against these limits before a person is asked to approve it — so length failures surface as errors, not as rejected posts. When you adapt one pillar across channels, use the [AI content repurposing workflow](https://marketmaster.dev/ai-content-repurposing) so each format respects these limits.

[Open the Studio](https://marketmaster.dev/studio)
[Build a tracked campaign link](https://marketmaster.dev/utm-builder)

---

Canonical HTML: https://marketmaster.dev/social-media-character-limits
